There are cameras everywhere and people are willing to shoot any event on their mobile cameras. More than ever it is easier to get the videos up on YouTube. In the social networking, user generated content, iPhone, twitter world one should assume, “anything you do or say can and will be blogged about or will show up in YouTube”. Any conversation you have, in person or email can be blogged about. I do realize the irony in this, as some of my blog posts do fit that category.
It did happen in the class of 09, a video of one our classmate talking about an event during the math camp showed up in Google Videos. So it is conceivable that our class presentation (botched or otherwise) may show up on YouTube. With the user created categorization through Tagging, once we put the content out there we lose control over how it is tagged (classified). Worse, it is possible for anyone to build on a video to make it look something completely different. Few years ago Scott McNeally said, “there is so privacy in the Internet, get used to it”. It is truer than ever.
A recent WSJ article (paid subscription required*) on a set of “AnnoyanceTech” gadgets said,
“It’s becoming easier for people to imagine that technology is a conduit through which they will solve all their social problems,”
I wonder if there is scope for developing a set of “AnnoyanceTech” gadgets to stop your work and other public performances from being YouTubed.
I am definitely not a new media Luddite who would ask for banning all video phones, but in some strange way it is not a comforting thought that the person who appear to be checking email, holding up the iPhone may be YouTubing you. After all a class room is a place to make mistakes and learn from these. But banning devices is avoiding the problem. We all need to learn collectively, the rules of social engagement in the new media world.
*When Murdoch completed the DowJones buyout he might make the online access free.
—Rags